The bill, H.F. No. 1375, introduced in the Minnesota House of Representatives by Representative Duran, seeks to repeal Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 626.892. This statute establishes the peace officer grievance arbitration selection procedure, which outlines how arbitrators are selected for disciplinary grievance cases involving peace officers.

Key Provisions of the Repealed Statute (Minnesota Statutes 2024, section 626.892):
- Definition of terms: Clarifies terms such as "grievance," "grievance arbitration," and "peace officer."
- Applicability: Requires the specific arbitration selection procedure to be used in all peace officer grievance arbitrations concerning written disciplinary actions, discharges, or terminations.
- Roster of Arbitrators: Maintains a list of six arbitrators, appointed by the Commissioner of the Bureau of Mediation Services, with required training in cultural competency, implicit bias, and law enforcement procedures.
- Selection of Arbitrators: Mandates a rotation system for assigning arbitrators to cases, eliminating the option for parties to negotiate or select arbitrators through other means.
- Training Requirements: Details required training for arbitrators on law enforcement experiences and issues such as cultural competency and bias.
- Exclusivity and Supersession: Prohibits peace officers and their representatives from negotiating a different arbitration selection method, ensuring the established process overrides other state arbitration laws.

Effect of the Bill:

By repealing section 626.892, the bill would eliminate the current structured arbitration selection process for peace officer grievances. This could allow for a return to previous arbitration procedures or the establishment of new processes under different statutes. The repeal may affect how disciplinary disputes involving peace officers are resolved, including potential changes in arbitrator selection, negotiation rights, and decision-making authority.